Glengall Wharf Canal Wall – Update 1

GWG

You may have seen our blog 2 years ago on this historic bit of Surrey Canal infrastructure. The only remaining section of canal bank, which marked the junction of the Camberwell branch (1810) with the Peckham branch (1830) of the Grand Surrey Canal, has probably stood in this position, if not this state, for 120-150 years.

However, although still absolutely solid, the surface is beginning to crumble and become unsightly, especially for the new flats opposite, and the council have been determined to replace it. Work started at the beginning of 2017 on a like-for-like replacement (rather than suburban bypass-style concrete block planters), as far as funds and practicality allow. The top end of Surrey Canal walk has been closed whilst this happens.

Cobbles before removal, garden pergola built on top

Cobbles of the former council refuse yard forming a beautiful basis for the garden. Pre-works test pit in the foreground

First up was the removal of a two metre-wide strip of the beautifully worn cobbles on the top surface, which now forms the ground level for the  Glengall Wharf community garden.

The work has been majorly distruptive for the garden, involving the removal of a fine old self-seeded plum tree and many garden structures. However, it was arranged to take place in winter, outside the growing season, to at least minimise this.

These cobbles, known as granite setts, have been taken up with a JCB and as far as possible preserved for replacement when the wall work is complete. It was thought that they’d been set solidly in concrete, but they’ve mostly come away cleanly, minus a few breakages.

Plum tree chopped down and rubble for cobbles

Plum tree removed and cobbles being taken up

 

Stacks

Granite setts being sorted and stacked for storage and reuse

Around the end of January, work started on excavating beneath the garden surface and removing soil from behind the wall. Here things got interesting for the contractors, as they discovered the foundations of the rubbish chutes, visible in the photo beneath, and on our previous blog

Girders

Bases of rubbish chutes, buried in concrete beneath the cobbles. Probably cut down at the closure of the yard and formation of Burgess Park

68a

Sailing barges moored up next to steel girder refuse chutes

Now, it’s a case of tearing down the old wall and carting it away.

teardown

Note the girder, impossible to remove from the concrete, to be cut back

One or two interesting finds were made:

Earthenware

Stash of earthenware mineral water bottles, various manufacturers. All previously broken, unfortunately!

It also became clear that a previous wall had existed further back than the concrete wall, judging by the foundations uncovered:foundations

Work is due to finish in March, so watch this space for updates. Please do go and see the works for yourself, and don’t hesitate to leave a comment here!

3 thoughts on “Glengall Wharf Canal Wall – Update 1

  1. Maybe I am just getting on a bit and sometimes don’t like change, I am saddened that this wall has been removed, yes it was old but it had history, I cannot believe that the people in flats opposite could complain about it, it was not unsightly in my opinion. Oh well, what will be will be.

  2. I’m with Roger on this one. I also overlook the gardens from my fifth floor flat and I’m on the RA committee for Galleria Court – at no time has anyone complained about the wharf being unsightly. I’m saddened by the decision to remove the last identifiable feature of Glengall wharf. Part of the park’s charm is precisely its range of odd features – entrances for roads that no longer exist, bridge etc. As a narrow boat owner I also think it’s a shame that the canal was so quickly filled in during the sixties – what an unimaginative, quick fix strategy. You only need to visit the Regents canal to see the importance of retaining this part of our industrial heritage. Equally upsetting though is the cost of this superfluous operation – on average five men working here per day with all the necessary plant over 2/3 months. The wall was not a danger of any kind and quite a robust structure – the time and effort involved in destroying it are a testimony to this. I’m amazed that, in such times of austerity, that the money’s there for this kind of thing. Finally, the Trafalgar bridge. Again months of costly works just to strengthen something which isn’t that old. Moreover, if they’d had an ounce of imagination wouldn’t it have been an idea to create an underpass here ? – us cyclists would have appreciated it and so would the motorists. Rant over…

    1. Hi Roger
      Thanks for setting the record straight on complaints. Perhaps I unwittingly perpetuated a rumour there, so it’s good to know the nearby residents are supporting the heritage side of things. A lot of us question the council’s priorities and decisions all over the borough – I could start citing examples…! The bridge works are all just about inspection, not even strengthening. The next thing I’ll need to blog about is the upcoming removal of New Church Road, and another chunk of history. As you imply, maybe making the park prettier but each time less distinctive. Bit by bit erasing the heritage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>